diff --git a/Local-vs-Cloud-CAPTCHA-Solving%3A-Which-to-Pick.md b/Local-vs-Cloud-CAPTCHA-Solving%3A-Which-to-Pick.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..140491d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Local-vs-Cloud-CAPTCHA-Solving%3A-Which-to-Pick.md
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+Headless browsers expose signals which detection systems look at, which is why pairing careful browser setup with dependable CAPTCHA solving matters. CapSkip covers the solving half so you focus on the browser side.
+
+A major benefits of running on your own hardware is price. Traditional services bill per solve, so your bill rise as volume increases. CapSkip uses flat-rate pricing and unlimited solves, so you can scale does not mean worrying about the meter.
+
+A Python codebase projects have a simple path with CapSkip, since it mirrors the request format of popular solving services. Often, that means pointing current code at CapSkip takes minimal effort - no rewrite.
+
+Residential IP pools and residential ones behave in different ways under detection pressure. Regardless of which blend you uses, CapSkip solves the CAPTCHA on your machine and adds no adding a remote hop to the path.
+
+Proxies are often necessary for serious scraping, and CapSkip works with proxies out of the box. You can send traffic however your setup requires while still solving CAPTCHAs on your own machine, which keeps the footprint natural across sessions.
+
+Image CAPTCHAs are still extremely common, on login forms to registration flows. CapSkip recognizes a huge range of image CAPTCHA variants on your own hardware, typically in about a tenth of a second. [this article](http://bexys.com/profile/katjabeeby4067) throughput matters the moment you process large numbers of challenges.
+
+Proxy support are often necessary for real automation, and CapSkip works with proxies out of the box. You can route requests the way your stack requires while still solving CAPTCHAs on your own machine, so behavior consistent across sessions.
+
+Used responsibly, CAPTCHA solving powers valid work like QA, monitoring, and authorized scraping. Always wise respecting each target's terms and applicable rules; used that way, a good solver is another automation helper.
+
+A short switch-over checklist keeps the move smooth: repoint your endpoint at CapSkip, confirm some real solves, then flip production. Because the request format mirrors popular services, most of the work is already done.
+
+Web scraping is among the top use cases teams reach for a CAPTCHA solver. A single stalled page will stall an whole job, so clearing challenges automatically lets throughput predictable. CapSkip slots into these pipelines neatly.
+
+The v3 flavor works differently: instead of a clickable challenge, it rates behavior silently. Producing a good score requires a solver that understands how v3 behaves, and CapSkip is built to handle it, returning tokens in seconds so your pipeline keeps moving.
+
+Reliability tends to improve once the solver lives on your own hardware. There is no reliance on a remote service that could slow down or hiccup at the worst time. CapSkip hands you this steadiness out of the box.
+
+Automated browsers leave signals which anti-bot systems watch for, so combining careful browser setup with dependable CAPTCHA solving counts. CapSkip covers the challenge half while you focus on the rest.
+
+One of the biggest benefits of processing on your own hardware comes down to price. Traditional services bill for each solve, so your costs climb as volume increases. CapSkip goes with fixed pricing and uncapped solves, so scaling without watching the meter.
+
+Teams migrating from 2Captcha often expect a painful migration. In practice, since CapSkip emulates the same request format, the change is largely a matter of endpoints plus keeping everything else the same.
+
+Evaluating solvers properly involves testing them on the same sites with matching proxies. Across that apples-to-apples footing, self-hosted flat-rate solving usually come out ahead for ongoing workloads.
+
+Data control has become a real concern when each challenge is sent to a third-party service. With CapSkip, no challenge data departs your hardware, so sensitive projects stay on your own systems. For sensitive data, that can be the deciding factor.
+
+Cloudflare performs quiet challenges which are meant to separate people from bots and skip classic puzzles. Getting past those dependably needs a purpose-built solver, and CapSkip covers Turnstile locally.
+
+The developer API is designed to mirror the endpoints of the major CAPTCHA-solving services. What this means, tools and scripts that already call those services are able to switch to CapSkip needing minimal changes and no new code.
+
+The v3 flavor takes a different tack: rather than a clickable challenge, it scores interactions silently. Getting a usable token takes a solver that handles how v3 behaves, and [CapSkip](https://plingue.com/read-blog/19_bot-development-meets-captcha-solving-a-practical-setup.html) is designed to handle it, producing results in seconds so your pipeline continues.
+
+Reliability tends to improve when solving runs on your own hardware. There is zero dependence on an external queue that could slow down or go down under load. CapSkip hands you that control out of the box.
+
+A Selenium setup remains a staple for browser automation, and CapSkip drops right in. Your your driver logic unchanged and delegate the CAPTCHA to CapSkip whenever one shows up, so the run keeps going without manual steps.
\ No newline at end of file